Incorrect Diabetes Terms

By David Mendosa

I am just back from a health conference where I heard too many incorrect terms to wait any longer to make this effort to correct the rest of the world.

Several of these terms are politically incorrect. One that I have been careful to avoid for years is to label someone who has diabetes as a diabetic. Now, diabetic medications and diabetic foods are fine. But many people who have diabetes actively resist being labeled as a diabetic, as if we were an illness. A correspondent writes, What I give as an example to doctors and other technical people is: If a person has hemorrhoids, does that make that person one? Here, I absolutely agree with the American Diabetes Association, which vigorously resists this label, insisting that we are people with diabetes.

Another term that may or may not be politically incorrect but is certainly objectionable to many people with diabetes is noncompliant. For most of us, to be labeled noncompliant is a worse slander than being called a diabetic. This is particularly true when health care people criticize us for not doing things that they havent clearly explained or where we think they are wrong.

An endocrinologist friend wisely says, The noncompliant label always grated on me its assuming a model of health care delivery that assumes the doc to be the captain of the ship and the patients to be chained to the oars

Control is another important issue. People frequently perceive Good control as a value judgement. We should replace it with non-emotional terms like tight control or intensive control or stringent control or aggressive control.

Likewise, Poor control is a terribly perjorative term implying a blame the victim mentality. I havent seen the obvious opposite of tight control loose control in the literature; the American Diabetes Association mentions less stringent, but I wonder if uncontrolled is the easiest answer.

Outmoded terms for forms of diabetes are still in use. What used to be called juvenile diabetes or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is now correctly referred to as type 1 diabetes. The former terms, adult-onset diabetes or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), are now properly called type 2 diabetes. It is type 1 and type 2, not Type 1 or Type I and Type 2 or Type II. And there is no such thing as borderline diabetes. If thats what you think you have, it is either pre-diabetes or diabetes. And forget about calling either condition sugar diabetes, and the pills that you might use to treat diabetes are not sugar pills.

Brittle diabetes is another outmoded term. It has been used to describe a pattern of widely fluctuating blood sugars. Most often the cause is a mismatch between lifestyle and treatment program. But too often it is used as an excuse by physicians and patients alike: This is a case of brittle diabetes and it can't be controlled.

While the term juvenile diabetes is outmoded, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (JDRF) has as much right to keep that name as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) has to keep its name. However, the JDRFs former name, the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation, is no longer current. And the organizations abbreviation is not, for some reason I dont understand, JDRFI.

To refer to any blood glucose meter as a Glucometer except one of those marketed by Bayer is not politically incorrect but it is legally incorrect. It is a registered Bayer trademark. See, for example,

It is also technically incorrect to call your blood glucose meter a monitor. The device is better called a meter because it reports a single readout at a time, according to an email message I received from someone who certainly knows, Anton H. (Tom) Clemens, the inventor of the first blood glucose meter. The process of recording a series of individual readings is appropriately called monitoring.

There are also even more niggling errors that we really should avoid. One is to refer to blood glucose as bG. We see that strange capitalization a lot. It is actually just a most successful marketing tool by the German company, Boehringer Mannheim, which had developed a blood glucose strip called Chemstrip bG. I asked pioneering meter marketer Charlie Suther why he make the b small and capitalized the G. That was part of my devious marketing, he replied. I wanted to worry the people at Ames Company [which is now part of Bayer]. We started the rumor that the little b, big G indicated the first of a whole series of blood tests, bG for blood glucose, bC for cholesterol, bH for hemoglobin and there was no such development planned.

When you test your blood, if you havent eaten too many carbs, your blood glucose (or BG) might be 100 mg/dl (5.56 mmol/l). But dont write it 100 mg/dL (with a capital representing liters). While mg/dL isnt uncommon, the authoritative Websters Guide to Abbreviations lists only dl as the acceptable abbreviation for deciliter.

When you say blood sugar instead of blood glucose, its not incorrect, although the term blood glucose is more precise. Another good reason to call it blood glucose is that it has an unambiguous abbreviation, BG. Abbreviating blood sugar as BS might not be understood the way you intended.

Another ambiguous abbreviation is ADA. While most of us think of the ADA as the American Diabetes Association, it works with another ADA, the American Dietetic Association. Based in Chicago, this other ADA is the worlds largest organization of food and nutrition professionals. The Americans with Disabilities Act is yet another ADA. There are even more ADAs to confuse you when you type in the URL, including the American Dental Association, Applied Digital Access, Audio Design Associates, and probably even more.

Some have suggested adding MODY to this listing of incorrect terms. MODY is shorthand for Maturity Onset Diabetes of Youth (or Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young) and certainly seems self-contradictory. People unfamiliar with this acronym often misapply it to any child or adolescent with any form of diabetes not needing insulin, but MODY has a distinct niche, describing a series of rare genetic disorders that are different than the increasingly-common problem of type 2 diabetes occurring at an early age. So, since there are no other terms for the cluster of MODY disorders, MODY is not incorrect (only illogical).

Got diabetes questions? Ask an Expert!

NOTE: The information is not intended to be a replacement or substitute for consultation with a qualified medical professional or for professional medical advice related to diabetes or another medical condition. Please contact your physician or medical professional with any questions and concerns about your medical condition.

Last Modified Date: July 02, 2013

All content on is created and reviewed in compliance with our editorial policy.

More on this Topic

No items are associated with this tag

Sign up for FREE dLife Newsletters

dLife Membership is FREE! Get exclusive access, free recipes, newsletters, savings, and much more! FPO

You are subscribed!
You are subscribed!
You are subscribed!
1209 Views 0 comments
by Brenda Bell
As I mentioned in an earlier post, one of the benefits that made it cost-effective for me to go with the real healthcare (HSA) plan rather than the phony (HRA) plan is that my company is now covering "preventative" medicines at $0 copay. The formulary for these, as stated by CVS/Caremark (my pharmacy benefits provider), covers all test strips, lancets, and control solutions. I dutifully get my doctor to write up prescriptions for all of my testing needs, submit...
  • Watch dLifeTV online now!

    Click here for more info
  • Join the #1 Diabetes Community.

    Join Today!
  • Everything you need to know about Insulin.

    Click here