Study Clarifies Amount of Exercise Needed to Keep Weight Off
July 25, 2008
Digg This! | Send to Newsvine | Add to del.icio.usJuly 25, 2008 (Newswise) - In addition to limiting calories, overweight and obese women may need to exercise 55 minutes a day for five days per week to sustain a weight loss of 10 percent over two years, according to a report in the July 28 issue of Archives of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives journals.
More than 65 percent of U.S. adults are overweight, a public health concern, according to background information in the article. “Among obese adults, long-term weight loss and prevention of weight regain have been less than desired,” the authors write. “Therefore, there is a need for more effective interventions.” Current recommendations prescribe 30 minutes of moderate physical activity on most days of the week, for a total of 150 minutes per week. However, a growing consensus suggests that more exercise may be needed to enhance long-term weight loss.
To calculate the amount of exercise needed, John M. Jakicic, Ph.D., of the University of Pittsburgh, and colleagues enrolled 201 overweight and obese women in a weight loss intervention between 1999 and 2003. All the women were told to eat between 1,200 and 1,500 calories per day. They were then assigned to one of four groups based on physical activity amount (burning 1,000 calories vs. 2,000 calories per week) and intensity (moderate vs. vigorous). Group meetings focusing on strategies for modifying eating and exercise habits, as well telephone calls with the intervention team, also were conducted over the two-year period.
After six months, women in all four groups had lost an average of 8 percent to 10 percent of their initial body weight. However, most were not able to sustain this weight loss. After two years the women’s weight was an average of 5 percent lower than their initial weight, with no difference between groups.
The 24.6 percent of individuals who did maintain a loss of 10 percent or more over two years reported performing more physical activity (an average of 1,835 calories per week, or 275 minutes per week over the baseline level of activity) than those who lost less weight. They also completed more telephone calls with the intervention team, engaged in more eating behaviors recommended for weight control and had a lower intake of dietary fat.
“This clarifies the amount of physical activity that should be targeted for achieving and sustaining this magnitude of weight loss, but also demonstrates the difficulty of sustaining this level of physical activity,” the authors write. “Research is needed to improve long-term compliance with this targeted level of physical activity. Moreover, continued contact with the intervention staff and the ability to sustain recommended eating behaviors also may be important contributing factors to maintaining a significant weight loss that exceeds 10 percent of initial body weight, which suggests that physical activity does not function independently of these other behaviors.”
(Arch Intern Med. 2008;168[14]:1550-1559. Available pre-embargo to the media at http://www.jamamedia.org.)
Editor’s Note: Dr. Jakicic is on the Scientific Advisory Board for BodyMedia Inc. and the Calorie Control Council (www.caloriescount.com). This study was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Please see the article for additional information, including other authors, author contributions and affiliations, financial disclosures, funding and support, etc.
Posted by dlife at July 25, 2008 05:39 PM
Comments
I would suggest water aerobics with hand weights for anyone who has joint problems.
Posted by: Eileen at August 6, 2008 11:22 AM
Having diabetes and arthritus causes problem with energetic exercise that helps shed the pounds. I was 188lbs and through diet alone have managed to maintain a weight now of 154lbs but cannot seem to shift further weight. I would love to hear from anyone who has an exercise routine that I may follow that does not cause problems to my joints.
Posted by: Marilyn Walter at August 6, 2008 04:42 AM
I read with some interest the summary of the study that seemed to suggest that women that exercised 40 to 55 minutes a day had the best results. While I have not seen the study, I would bet that the women that exercised more were also the women that watch their diet more than the women that did not. Many women may not lose weight easily eating 1500 calories a day, especially if this is close to the baseline metabolic needs.
I would suggest that diet plays a greater role in weight loss because it take a net loss of 3500 calories less then the body's needs to lose a pound of weight (hopefully fat). That equates to 500 pounds less a day ideally by a combination of less calories in and some more calories burned in exercise.
I think one possible issue with focusing on exercise (that the article seems to) is one cannot easily exercise off 500 calories a day and make a life style change that is needed to affect a lasting weight loss.
I just posted on my latest results entitled, "Melting the fat, Techniques that work" here: http://leananmean.com/http:/leananmean.com/melting-the-fat-techniques-that-work/
Regards,
John W. Zimmer
Posted by: John W. Zimmer at July 28, 2008 11:21 PM














